Statement on Initiative 900 election results

“As we expected, Initiative 900 is passing with a fairly comfortable margin, according to the latest results,” said Permanent Defense Chair Andrew Villeneuve. “While the initiative was poorly drafted and not subject to public hearings or other constructive input, voters saw the words ‘performance audits’ on the ballot, and decided that they would like to expand the scope of the auditor’s office.”

Tim Eyman does not deserve credit for Initiative 900. His main financial backer, Michael Dunmire, does. It was Dumire’s money that put Initiative 900 on the ballot. Dunmire poured almost half a million dollars into Eyman’s political committee to support 900.

“We still think Initiative 900 is flawed, and we will urge the Legislature to go back and make some changes to the language during the next legislative session,” Villeneuve added. “In particular, we’d like to see state legislators give the citizen advisory board additional teeth so that all this power is not concentrated in the hands of one official.”

This entry was posted in Election Postmortem, Statements & Advisories and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

Comments are closed.

  • Have You Met a Petitioner?

    • Permanent Defense Home
    • About Permanent Defense
    • Contact Us
    • Volunteer
    • Media Center
    • Who is Tim Eyman?
    • Research and Reports
    • Essays and Position Papers
    • Dangerous Initiatives
    • NO on Initiative 1053
    • StopGreed.org
    • Archives
    • User Agreement
    • Supporting Sound Transit
    • NPI Advocate
    • Pacific NW Portal
    • NW Progressive Institute